How are the sequences from “Pillow Talk” and “Fringe” different? Discuss the differences in pace and style of editing as well as the effect the editing has on meaning/audiences reception of the extracts.
Within the sequences from “Pillow Talk” and “Fringe” editing is used frequently to create different effects to suit the situation within the film. “Pillow Talk” is an old fashioned film so therefore uses basic, traditional styles of editing however “Fringe” is a more modern programme so resulting them to using up to date editing and using their edits more effectively. It is clear that when watching both these sequences there is a different pace used and they are both received differently by certain audiences.
“Pillow Talk” is a 1950’s romantic comedy directed by Michael Gordon which concentrates on two characters, one played by Doris Day and the other played by Rock Hudson. It portrays their bumpy relationship and how they eventually fall in love. “Fringe” is a modern, science fiction television programme which lasted three seasons.
The pace within “Pillow Talk” and the pace within “Fringe” are obviously going to show differences because of the time periods in which they were set in. With “Pillow Talk” being set in 1959 and “Fringe” being shown last in 2010 it is clear the pace in “Pillow Talk” is much slower and less upbeat than “Fringe.” The average time between each cut in the sequence from “Pillow Talk” is twelve seconds and within this time the film is being filmed with static camera movement. This is resulting in the film to come across as relaxed and gives the audience the impression that nothing significant is happening where as in “Pillow Talk” the average time between each edit is four short seconds and within that time it is being filmed in many different ways using, zoom in and out, moving panning and tilting which altogether makes it more exciting for an audience to watch and makes it more intriguing. This shows some significant differences in how ways of editing has changed over time such as the pace, making it different speeds to suit the atmosphere within the sequences therefore then creating an intended effect on the audience and it also shows how the way filming between the edits have changed, as filming has become more modern, the way of filming has developed creating many different effects on the viewers.
As well as the pace being individual in both sequences, the edits themselves are also different and are used in different ways. The sequence from “Pillow Talk” hardly experiments with using different types of edits; it sticks to the basic ways, again this probably is down to the time period. The majority of the time the edit used is a straight cut which is straight forward and sets the audience straight to the point and is particularly effective within “Pillow Talk” as the whole sequence is concentrated on conversation between two characters so by using straight cuts it makes it more realistic, as if you was there with the characters listening and watching their conversation. A dissolve cut is used in “Pillow Talk” as the first edit within this sequence. Dissolve cuts can be used in many ways like to show a different scenery or to make it seem later on in the day. For this particular edit it starts off being a conversation between two men, talking about a female character, a dissolve edit is then used to then go to a different scene in which the female character they were talking about is. By doing this it informs the audience early on in the sequence of what the film is going to be about and also what characters are going to be the main focus. Also by the men talking about this lady it gives the audience a first impression of the female character. One more effective edit that is used in “Pillow Talk” is a wipe. The wipe is used effectively to create a split screen for a phone call conversation to take place. It is used for when the two main characters within this film talk on the phone. The reason why this is an effective edit is because it gives the audience an easy way to see and take in the conversation they are having. It also allows the facial expressions of each character and reaction to what each other is saying bee seen clearly by the audience.
The edits that are used in “Fringe” are surprisingly very straight forward and basic. The straight cuts used throughout the sequence however do reflect the fact of “Fringe” being very modern by keeping the cuts neat and precise it allows the audience to get straight down to the point of the programme. With the genre being a science fiction I would personally expect the cuts to be very bold and different to what is seen in “Pillow Talk” although the straight forward cuts are still effective due to the many ways in which the programme is filmed. An example of a way in which “Fringe” is filmed is when there is a close up of a man writing and the camera movement moves to the left showing everything on the table and then the camera is lifted up at a steady speed then focusing on the other man. This is very effective as it creates suspense and tension for the audience in what the man is writing down and it also gains the audiences likeness for the other character. This sums up that “Fringe” doesn’t necessarily portray to be modern through its ways of editing however it does by the pace of editing and also the way it is filmed. Unlike “Pillow Talk” were the editing does in fact reflect the time period it was made in.
With these two sequences having been set in two different time periods it has made an effect on the way in which an audience reacts to each of them. “Pillow Talk” was much better received within the time period it was set because the audience where adapted to this way of editing however they would also see a new way of editing because a wipe to split screen was very new and fresh creating a good reception of the film. If this way of editing was released in the modern day I would expect the audience to find it lengthy and maybe boring as the length between the edits is quite long, also they way its filmed in between the edits is not very creative and is mainly static making the audience to probably lose interest. With the editing being slow it gives the audience an easier way to get the storyline and meaning of the film. “Fringe” however is received well in the modern day due to its quickly paced edits which creates the programme to be entertaining although it can create the audience to lose track of the storyline as there is a lot going on creating the programme to be busy and in some ways confusing.
In conclusion of all these points it is clear to see that both “Pillow Talk” and “Fringe” are very different, in the way they are filmed, the edits used, the way they are received by an audience and also the pace of both sequences. Although they are both very different, they both seem to still be successful in the way that they create an intended effect on their suited audience.